Casper Admits To “Ghost” Advisory Service Charges
Can a funeral home charge consulting fees and remain impartial in making funeral recommendations? That and other questions were sparked by a press release headline posted on the Internet: “Casper Funeral Advisors announced today in Boston, Massachusetts, that they will waive their funeral advisory fees for Boston, Eastern Massachusetts, and Cape Cod Hospice and Palliative Care Families.”
The lead sentence proclaimed: “This service is ideal for members on hospice or palliative care in Boston, Eastern Massachusetts or Cape Cod looking for answers on funeral costs and cremation costs, funeral planning options and funeral arrangements.” David A. Casper, Managing Funeral Director President of Casper Funeral Advisors stated, “During this time of great emotion, stress and deep concern for Boston, Eastern Massachusetts, and Cape Cod hospice and palliative care families, Casper Funeral Advisors will waive our $150 an hour funeral advisory expense. This will provide families a resource to obtain fair, independent, and impartial overview of funeral service options and funeral arrangements.” After a lengthy description of specifics and some background on the operation, the press release said: “Casper Funeral Services help you review and evaluate a funeral services or cremation services plan customized to your loved one’s individual wishes and needs, in addition to showing you ways to avoid costly items and services you don’t want or need. Savings in money on funeral arrangements are, therefore guaranteed.” Funeral Monitor posed the question about impartiality to several prominent members of the funeral industry and independent funeral directors: Curtis D. Rostad, executive director of the Indiana Funeral Directors Association, said he’d never heard of the practice: “…at least not as being provided by a funeral home.” When asked how they can maintain impartiality when they also own a funeral operation, Rostad said, “They can’t.” His perception of the fee premise? “Weird,” said Rostad. “Haven’t funeral homes always given people their options as a part of what they do?” Joshua Slocum, executive director of the Funeral Consumers Alliance said, “I find it questionable that a funeral home (or any business in any field) would claim that they’ll give you impartial advice on what to buy, with absolutely no slant that would push the buyer toward their own business. That’s why people go to Consumer Reports to compare cars, not to the dealership to get ‘educated.’ “They have every right to plug their own business, and argue that their service is superior. But they can’t claim to be neutrally educating the public,” Slocum continued. Was this just another way to pad the funeral bill? Slocum said, “My question is how this $150 fee relates to the non-declinable basic services fee the funeral home is almost surely charging for every arrangement. Or, is this $150 consulting’ service some sort of separate business offering? Is it charged to families arranging a funeral as part of the basic services fee? “Too many questions,” Slocum asserted. “This appears to be nothing more than an attempt to attract more referrals from hospice organizations. Wise hospice outfits would do their own research to help patients choose among funeral providers. Having too close a relationship with one funeral home can lead to patients being steered to a funeral home inappropriately. “A Vermont hospice volunteer called me last week to report that their “funeral home sponsor,’ a mortuary that contributed to the hospice, had pulled out in a huff after the volunteer answered questions on planning for death at a panel discussion that included the topic of home funeral (sans mortuary),” said Slocam. She was shocked, but I told her I was shocked the hospice would put itself in such a conflicted position in the first place. Businesses don’t exist to charitably educate the homeless kitties. They exist to make money, and pretending otherwise is inappropriate. “I’ve seen a number of people attempt to open funeral consulting business, but I don’t know of anyone who’s made a real go of it,” Slocam said. “Funeral consumers Alliance’s 100 or so affiliate groups offer advice and education free (or for a modest donation of about $25). I don’t know why anyone would pay a consultant $150 (I’ve seen much higher) for this.” A.J. Daoud, owner of Cox Needham Funeral Home in Pilot Mountain, North Carolina, notes that in “some areas non-licensed persons are able to act as agents for a family and shop for the best price. If you check some of the other trades, this practice is similar to wedding consultants or planners. Is it ethical to have a licensed establishment charge? I would say not.” Funeral monitor posed similar questions to Joseph W. Casper of Casper Funeral Services, the Boston-based funeral director who posted the press release. His response was unexpected. “We set up the Casper Funeral Advisors to deal with cross-country calls we were receiving for international shipping,” said Casper. “These people would cll us countless times after the shipping had been arranged and done. We set up the Casper Funeral Advisors (CFA) specifically to address that issue. We thought it essential to post an hourly charge to discourage people like the man from California who called us about 20 times when we knew he had other plant to ship his family member to Russia This is but one example of the day and night calls we were receiving.” The weirdest part of that response is that anyone visiting the Casper Web site is bombarded with a masthead proclaiming: Casper Funeral Services (on the left side) with a stylized graphic depicting the globe and (on the right) the announcement that its business is “international funeral shipping and cremations.” Reinforcing that declaration is the text Casper provided for search engines. When trying to locate the company, it popped up as the first company on a Google search. The header says: “Lowest: funeral Shipping, Deceased Shipping, Boston Cremation…” The text that follows repeats the claim: “Casper Funeral Services specializes in funeral shipping, deceased shipping, international funeral shipping, Boston cremation, Massachusetts cremation…” Thus, it’s hard to believe that a company that so actively pushes international shipping would be surprised at, or annoyed by, round-the-clock calls about shipping. It is, after all their self-proclaimed place in the market. But, like Alice in Wonderland, things got curiouser and curiouser. The second part of Casper’s response sounded as though there were two press releases rather than just the one to which Funeral Monitor referred: “As for the hospice and palliative care press release, we contracted with a company to write and distribute press releases for us to promote Casper Funeral Services, and unfortunately I had not read the piece closely enough before authorizing its release.” That one is a stumper. How could the person who approved the release have failed to notice the phrasing in the headline and subhead “Once the obvious flaws in the piece were called to my attention, I immediately had it removed and have since removed all information about CFA from our Web side because of the unintended way it appeared to suggest that CFA was looking to assist consumers get lower-priced funerals at other funeral homes.” Does that mean Casper was trying to help patrons get lower-priced funerals only at his location? “It has always been our intention to try to market our own funeral home in new and different ways,” said Casper. “In hindsight Casper Funeral Advisors was probably not the best way to go about that. We have never charged anyone for our assistance or advice and we have since removed all mention of Casper Funeral Advisors. We never intended this to be any more than a marketing piece for Casper Funeral Services. Simply put, we were trying to market our business and regret doing it the wrong way.” Apparently there never was a Casper Funeral Advisors charging $150 an hour. It was, instead, a deceptive business practice designed to fend off non-area callers while appearing to be concerned about the financial needs of local prospective clients. With such admitted marketing practices, is ti any wonder that some people consider funeral service to be on an ethical par with used are salesmen? Surely ethical funeral directors must quiver in frustration at such practices. Some states have, historically, been prime locales for political corruption. Among them are New Jersey and Louisiana, but perhaps Illinois should wear the corruption crown. In addition to the deceased voting in elections, one governor serving time for political corruption, the most recent state COE awaiting indictment and trial – and the state’s newest U.S. senator alleged to have perjured himself to get a job nod – there’s still more. State Comptroller Dan Hynes is refusing to release records showing what his office did to safeguard a troubled funeral trust fund that has spawned claims of financial mismanagement and fears of bankruptcy from funeral home directors who are on the hook for tens of millions of dollars, says the State Journal-Register, Illinois’ oldest newspaper. Under state law, the comptroller’s office is responsible for regulating the funeral industry. The law also gives the comptroller broad auditing power to ensure the safety of money paid by consumers to ensure their funerals are paid for before they die. Hynes is refusing to release copies of audits and financial reviews of a preneed trust fund formerly administered by the Illinois Funeral Directors Association and believed to be worth $300 million. Hynes also won’t release correspondence his office received last year from Regions Bank, which considered taking over the trust but backed out. The newspaper says the records might eventually be released via a lawsuit filed by funeral home directors against the IFDA. Edward Wallace, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said he intends to demand the records during the discovery process in the Cook County lawsuit. It shouldn’t take a lawsuit to get the records from the comptroller, according to a funeral home director-turned-lawmaker and an expert on the state Freedom of Information Act. “Provide the documents, answer the questions,” said state Rep. Dan Brady, R-Bloomington, who still holds a funeral home director’s license from the state. “It’s not only reasonable to ask, it’s imperative to ask. It’s imperative for some 49,000 Illinois residents who put their trust in the IFDA that they get answers. Hiding things is the nature of being a politician, but Illinois regulators say the Illinois Funeral Directors Association should never have been allowed to oversee the trust – which it administered for 27 years. But, as previously reported in Funeral Monitor, according to the State Journal-Register, the IFDA didn’t operate in a vacuum: “Tens of millions fo dollars melted away despite numerous safeguards in state law designed to keep the money safe, including provisions for annual audits by the state comptroller’s office. Even after it became clear that deficits were staggering, it took nearly two years for the state to wrest control of the fund from the IFDA.” According to Wilson Beebe Jr., the executive director of the New Jersey State Funeral Directors Association and a widely regarded expert on preneed funding, the Illinois problem “comes out of the 1987-127 Internal Revenue Service ruling.” Given that it was a federal government ruling that created the problem and it was the state’s oversight mechanism that failed to adequately detect and correct the problem, one has to wonder who the comptroller is protecting. Is he protecting his own negligence or that of the Internal Revenue Service?
Burial Services, Cremation, Cremation Options, Funeral Planner, History, News, Religion, funeral